Home/ Hassaan Arif/Answers
Ask Hassaan Arif
  1. Asked: May 31, 2025In:

    Has anyone used AI tools for email generation? I'm looking for something that feels less robotic.

    Hassaan Arif
    Best Answer
    Hassaan Arif Enlightened

    Yes, quite a few AI tools now generate emails that feel more natural and less robotic. Tools like ChatGPT, Jasper, and Copy.ai are popular choices. They let you guide tone, length, and context, so the email sounds like you—not a machine. If you want something that blends well into your workflow, conRead more

    Yes, quite a few AI tools now generate emails that feel more natural and less robotic. Tools like ChatGPT, Jasper, and Copy.ai are popular choices. They let you guide tone, length, and context, so the email sounds like you—not a machine.

    If you want something that blends well into your workflow, consider using these with Gmail plugins or browser extensions. You can even fine-tune responses by adding personal notes or context prompts.

    Hunter.io and Snov.io let you discover verified email addresses quickly. They also offer outreach automation with personalized sequences to avoid generic spam vibes.

    Lemlist focuses on creating highly personalized cold emails with dynamic content, helping your messages feel more human and relevant.

    Reply.io combines email finding with multi-channel outreach and AI-driven personalization, making follow-ups smarter and less repetitive.

    Heyreach and instantly.io are also better options as well

    In the end, the secret isn’t just the tool, but how you prompt it. A little human input goes a long way.

    See less
  2. Asked: May 30, 2025In:

    My training loss on my transformer model just won’t settle down, it keeps jumping all over the place. Could this be a learning rate issue or something else?

    Hassaan Arif
    Hassaan Arif Enlightened

    If your transformer’s training loss is jumping around, a high learning rate is often to blame. Try reducing it to something like 1e-4 or 1e-5 if you're using Adam. Using a warm-up schedule can also help smooth out the early stages of training. Gradient explosions can cause instability too, so it’s wRead more

    If your transformer’s training loss is jumping around, a high learning rate is often to blame.

    Try reducing it to something like 1e-4 or 1e-5 if you’re using Adam. Using a warm-up schedule can also help smooth out the early stages of training.

    Gradient explosions can cause instability too, so it’s worth adding gradient clipping.

    Also check your input data for noise, mislabeled samples, or inconsistent padding these small issues can throw training off.

    Sometimes it’s just about slowing things down and letting the model learn at a steady rhythm.

    See less
  3. Asked: May 29, 2025In:

    What are the most beginner-friendly tools/platforms to prototype a voice assistant (e.g., Rasa, Dialogflow, Alexa Skills Kit)?

    Hassaan Arif
    Hassaan Arif Enlightened

    For beginners prototyping a voice assistant, the sweet spot is finding tools that balance ease of use with real capabilities. Here are a few standout options: Dialogflow (by Google) – Great for fast prototyping with a GUI. Natural language understanding (NLU) is solid, and it integrates easily withRead more

    For beginners prototyping a voice assistant, the sweet spot is finding tools that balance ease of use with real capabilities.

    Here are a few standout options:

    Dialogflow (by Google) – Great for fast prototyping with a GUI. Natural language understanding (NLU) is solid, and it integrates easily with Google Assistant.

    Rasa – More hands-on but gives you full control. Best if you want to self-host and go beyond basic intents. Ideal once you’re past the “drag-and-drop” phase.

    Alexa Skills Kit – Perfect if you’re targeting Alexa devices. Amazon provides templates, tutorials, and even voice testing tools.

    Start with Dialogflow if you want to build fast. Shift to Rasa when you want freedom. Think of it like training wheels vs. riding on your own both are part of the journey.

    See less
  4. Asked: May 29, 2025In:

    Anybody knows good methods to debug autograd issues in dynamic graphs, especially with JAX or PyTorch?

    Hassaan Arif
    Hassaan Arif Enlightened

    If you’re hitting autograd issues in JAX or PyTorch, here’s what works for me: First, check gradients are even enabled – in PyTorch, make sure requires_grad=True. In JAX, use jax.grad only on functions with real float outputs. Use gradient checkers – PyTorch’s gradcheck or JAX’s check_grads help spoRead more

    If you’re hitting autograd issues in JAX or PyTorch, here’s what works for me:

    First, check gradients are even enabled – in PyTorch, make sure requires_grad=True. In JAX, use jax.grad only on functions with real float outputs.

    Use gradient checkers – PyTorch’s gradcheck or JAX’s check_grads help spot silent failures.

    Debug with hooks or prints – PyTorch has register_hook() on tensors to inspect gradients. In JAX, jax.debug.print() is a lifesaver inside jit.

    Simplify the code – isolate the function, drop the model size, and test with dummy data. Most bugs pop up when the setup is too complex.

    In short: test small, print often, and trust the math to guide you.

    See less
  5. Asked: May 29, 2025In:

    What's the best way to normalize data without leaking info from the test set into the training process?

    Hassaan Arif
    Hassaan Arif Enlightened

    To normalize data without leaking test set information, always follow this golden rule: compute normalization parameters only on the training data. Here’s the correct process: Split your data first – before any preprocessing. Fit the scaler only on training data – e.g., scaler.fit(X_train). TransforRead more

    To normalize data without leaking test set information, always follow this golden rule: compute normalization parameters only on the training data.

    Here’s the correct process:

    Split your data first – before any preprocessing.

    Fit the scaler only on training data – e.g.,

    scaler.fit(X_train).

    Transform both sets using that scaler –

    scaler.transform(X_train) and scaler.transform(X_test).

    This ensures your model only learns from what it truly should know, preserving the integrity of your evaluation. It’s a small step with a huge impact think of it as respecting the boundary between practice and the real test.

    See less
  6. Asked: May 29, 2025In:

    I trained my model, but it's performing too well on validation — could this be data leakage? How do I check for that?

    Hassaan Arif
    Hassaan Arif Enlightened

    Absolutely, I’ve been in that spot, getting 98 to 99 percent accuracy on validation and feeling confident, only to see the performance drop a lot on truly unseen data. That’s usually a sign of data leakage. What helped me was carefully checking my data splits to make sure training and validation setRead more

    Absolutely, I’ve been in that spot, getting 98 to 99 percent accuracy on validation and feeling confident, only to see the performance drop a lot on truly unseen data. That’s usually a sign of data leakage. What helped me was carefully checking my data splits to make sure training and validation sets didn’t overlap. I also reviewed my features to find anything that might accidentally reveal the target. Sometimes a feature acts like a shortcut without you realizing it. I looked for very high correlations between features and the label because if something is almost perfectly correlated, that’s suspicious.

    Finally, I tried a simple model. If it also performed too well, it was another clue leakage was happening. Fixing these things usually made validation accuracy drop, but then the results matched real-world performance better, which is what really matters.

    See less